Card image cap

John Xuna's Issue Positions (Political Courage Test)

Key


Official Position: Candidate addressed this issue directly by taking the Political Courage Test.

Inferred Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, but Vote Smart inferred this issue based on the candidate's public record, including statements, voting record, and special interest group endorsements.

Unknown Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, or we could not infer an answer for this candidate despite exhaustive research of their public record.

Additional Information: Click on this icon to reveal more information about this candidate's position, from their answers or Vote Smart's research.

Other or Expanded Principles & Legislative Priorities are entered exactly as candidates submit them. Vote Smart does not edit for misspelled words, punctuation or grammar.

John Xuna has provided voters with clear stances on key issues by responding to the 2016 Political Courage Test.

What is the Political Courage Test?

Florida Congressional Election 2016 Political Courage Test

Pro-choice Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
* As a humanist and freethinker, I have always supported all 3 issues: abortion, LGBT equality, and loving/marrying whomever you wish to love. ~ Candidly, let me also reveal that, I am a supporter of the �right-to-die with dignity� (euthanasia), and regret the treatment that Dr. Kevorkian received from our legal system.
Yes In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending?
Yes In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
Our military budget is more than the military budget of all the next 11 ranking nations. That is too much, almost 700 billion dollars, that is more than all other items in the discretionary budget (55% of it, and about 20% of the National budget). Bringing it down to 30% would be sensible and reasonable. We don't have to be the police enforcer of the planet. Only we should intervene when there is an international consensus, and we participate as one more nation in the search for order and justice.
Yes Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
Citizen's United has to be abolished, and we should get rid of Super-Pacs, being from the Koch Bros, from NRA, from AIPAC, Big Oil, Big Pharma, or whoever.
No Do you support capital punishment for certain crimes?
Yes Do you support alternatives to incarceration for certain non-violent offenders such as mandatory counseling or substance abuse treatment?
No Do you support mandatory minimum sentences for non-violent drug offenders?
I am not a religious-right zealot, I am a scientist using common-sense and a sensible attitude toward other humans. Spend the money in education, and seek racial justice, and we will see a significant decrease in crime.
Yes Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
No Do you support lowering taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
Yes Do you support providing tax incentives to businesses for the purpose of job creation?
Lowering taxes to low bracket earners, but not to millionaires. Those taxes to the latter should be increased as to eliminate the skew in wealth distribution and bring back the middle class. Tax incentives for job creation are fine, but not to the point they become ugly loopholes.
Unknown Position Do you generally support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
We need to move to the NEXT GENERATION Common Core. Yet, as a former Teacher and Professor, I would agree that the number of standardized tests are taking precious time that should be instead use for teaching. In the PISA assessments we are lacking behind many countries (if I recall was like 35th in Math, and 27th in Science). Common Core is just for Math and Language Arts. Next Generation adds Science (and hopefully Physics). Few states have adopted because of resistance from religious elements to the teaching of Evolution, and Global Warming.
No Do you support building the Keystone XL pipeline?
Yes Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)?
Yes Do you support increased regulations on the hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") industry?
Fracking damages the ground strata, fracturing aquifers, and then injects toxic chemicals, that could cause permanent damage to the quality of those aquifers. It is an irreversible heavy-handed technology. I have been a former watchdog of the excessive use of fossil fuels, and tried to promote alternative sources. I wrote an interesting article in 1979 which was submitted to the White House (Pres. Carter), Congress and several national magazines. Wrote a book in energy, created several websites (that I call "Science Beacons") Please visit my "science beacons at: www.OilDepletion.com, www.PetrolSOS.com, www.DoomedGlobe.com, www.ZUET.com (Zeroing in Underground Energy Technologies).
Yes Do you believe that human activity is contributing to climate change?
Yes Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
At 400ppm of CO2 and increasing at 4ppm per year, we will arrive to 1,000ppm in less than 150 years. That level of CO2 is -according to OSHA- toxic if submerged into it for extended periods of time. Sea level rise is unrelentingly rising, currently at 3mm, but picking up to 4 mm per year. Even at 3mm, that implies 300mm (1 foot) every hundred year. In 1000 year it would be -conservatively- ten times as much or 10ft, more than 3 yards. Moreover, for each 1y up it goes -on average- 19y inland.
Yes Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
I have a problem not with the second amendment to the US Constitution per se (as far as having a right to bear arms "for the right reasons"). Yet, what made sense in the 1700's (and with firearms of that era) might not make sense in the XXI century, and with our present rapid-fire automatic weapons. I strongly support [1] a ban on automatic weapons, [2] stringent registration, [3] immediate background check of those trying to buy weapons, and [4] an end to the loopholes in gun shows. IT IS ABOUT TIME TO PUT "COMMON-SENSE GUN LEGISLATION" IN PLACE !!
No Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
Repealing? Not at all! ~ If anything I will fight with teeth and nails for the opposite. That is, to improve it, and to expand it, as to be a "Medicare for all citizens", not just for seniors. ~ It is imperative �as well- to rein in the pharmaceutical industry (Big Pharma) and to end the rigging done by health-insurance companies .
Unknown Position Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
* I do believe that there should be a �path to citizenship� and a �path to legalization� for those illegal Immigrant who do not have a criminal record, and have been working and paying taxes in America for many years. ~ Illegal Immigrants are not in hiding, they are in the open, doing landscaping, babysitting, room-cleaning in hotels, working in kitchens, ... I'm a humanist who thinks that �if we play a blind eye� (ignoring that illegal Immigrants are among us) and -tacitly- consenting them to stay for years, then we CANNOT �later- force them out, and break families apart.
Yes Do you support same-sex marriage?
* As a humanist and freethinker, I have always supported all 3 issues: abortion, LGBT equality, and loving/marrying whomever you wish to love. ~ Candidly, let me also reveal that, I am a supporter of the �right-to-die with dignity� (euthanasia), and regret the treatment that Dr. Kevorkian received from our legal system.
No Should the U.S use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the United States from possessing a nuclear weapon?
Unknown Position Do you support increased American intervention in Iraq and Syria beyond air support?
Clarifying this ambiguous questions. [1] It might be reasonably to closely follow and investigate people who we might suspect of connection to terrorist groups. But it is imperative not to exceed that authority, which should only be used in emergency situations. [2] Diplomacy should be used when dealing with nuclear threats. Macho attitudes are prone to cause a nuclear holocaust. In N.Korea or Iran, diplomacy can work. Other save avenues could be also being explored.
No Do you support allowing individuals to divert a portion of their Social Security taxes into personal retirement accounts?
Most individuals trusting their money to Banks, will sooner or later risk losing their money, especially if all banks are allow to be Investment banks. We also need Glass-Steagall back, and if so, some exceptions to the rule could be made.

SpendingIndicate what federal spending levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category; you can use a number more than once.TaxesIndicate what federal tax levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category; you can use a number more than once.

Slightly Decrease a) Agriculture
Slightly Increase b) Arts
Greatly Decrease c) Defense
Greatly Increase d) Education
Greatly Increase e) Environment
Maintain Status f) Homeland Security
Slightly Decrease g) International aid
Slightly Increase h) Medical Research
Slightly Increase i) Scientific Research
Greatly Increase j) Space exploration
Maintain Status k) United Nations
Slightly Increase l) Welfare
Slightly Decrease a) Capital gains taxes
Greatly Increase b) Corporate taxes
Slightly Decrease c) Small business taxes
Maintain Status d) Excise taxes (alcohol)
Maintain Status e) Excise taxes (cigarettes)
Maintain Status f) Excise taxes (transportation fuel)
Greatly Decrease g) Income taxes (low-income families)
Slightly Decrease h) Income taxes (middle-income families)
Greatly Increase i) Income taxes (high-income families)
Slightly Decrease j) Inheritance taxes
Slightly Decrease k) Payroll taxes
l) Other or expanded categories
Regarding: (a) Agriculture, I will decrease subsidies to some major farming corporations, but will increase help to farming families. Overall it probably be a net slight decrease. (l) Welfare. Having been in financial predicaments a couple of times in the past, I know how good is to -temporarily- get assistance with food, or other items. I would increase the affordability of homes to poor people by an increase in funds for that purpose. Yet, if we keep a good eye, any abuses to the system will not be that significant, despite there will always bigots blaming the poor for freeloading.
[1] MORE DEVELOPMENT OF SOLAR ENERGY, AND OTHER ALTERNATIVES. [2] MORE INVESTMENT IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION. [3] PROMOTE LONGER MATERNITY LEAVE, AND PAID FAMILY VACATION. [4] RATHER THAN DECREASING MEDICARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY ENTITLEMENT, I would promote the opposite. Medicare FOR ALL (universal or single payer), and seniors DESERVE A RAISE. I am retired after having worked for 50 years, I make $1,600 in social security. It is tough to live on that amount. Well, I was a professional engineer who paid FICA handsomely, so those who were not that fortunate might not even make $800 a month. Terrible!

Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.

arrow_upward